Last week, you’ll recall the the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight released proposed guidelines covering conforming loan limits — and that the language used led to some real confusion from yours truly. It looks like I wasn’t alone in my confusion, as the OFHEO today released a clarification of its proposed guidance, adding scenarios to help illustrate how the guidance would be applied. And it turns out my initial reading of the proposed guidance was actually correct — price declines are accumulated until the magnitude of decrease is greater than 1 percent before being implemented. With that squared away, my original question stands: is it really a good idea to accumulate losses until an arbitrary magnitude is reached? I realize the level here is set at 100 basis points, but it seems that this process of accumulation could leave the GSEs trailing market conditions rather than adjusting to current market reality.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
From resilience to antifragility: Rethinking cybersecurity for real estate and mortgage professionals
In information security, we’ve long spoken about resilience. The goal has been to withstand an attack, recover quickly, and return to business as usual. But in today’s environment—where attackers adapt and evolve daily—resilience is no longer enough. We must go further. We must embrace antifragility.
-
From local to global: RE/MAX’s Chris Lim on the next era of real estate relationships
-
Stop marketing like it’s 2008: You’re invisible
-
RE/MAX accelerates real estate innovation with AI and technology
-
Retirement plans for small-business owners have visible generational gaps
-
VA loans rise as housing market shifts toward buyers
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
