Most media sources will report that mortgage applications posted their first increase in three weeks, according to data released by the Mortgage Bankers Association on Wednesday, as mortgage rates fell slightly. The group’s weekly application survey found that applications rose 0.5 percent from one week earlier, with a composite index rising to 421.6 for the week ended Aug. 22. Applications are off 31.2 percent from year-ago levels, however, the MBA said. But — as has been the case throughout the current cycle — the MBA data may be overstating forward demand for mortgages, given that the index data doesn’t correct for multiple applications. A separate application index, known as the MAX, found that applications fell sharply last week; the MAX corrects for multiple applications, and tends to be relied upon by prepayment modelers more often, as a result. The MAX national application index fell 6.4 percent last week, while a California sub-index fell an amazing 7.5 percent; the sharp decline in the MAX indices suggests that an overall increase in applications is likely tied to borrowers scrambling to get approved for a loan program. Of course, hard evidence of this trend is difficult to come by. But anecdotally, it’s easy to see how this could take place: underwriting standards are tighter than ever, and lenders often suggest that borrowers shop programs to ensure they can qualify for a loan. And, of course, troubled borrowers may be putting in application after application in the hope they can stave off a foreclosure. “As the credit crunch begins to slam into Main Street both psychologically and in actual funding, mortgage originations may set new historical lows for the balance of the year,” said Paul Descloux, publisher at Mortgage Maxx LLC, which publishes the MAX index. Heading back to the MBA’s data, the group said both refinance and purchase applications posted small increases last week; the refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 35.2 percent of total applications from 34.8 percent the previous week. But in terms of attempting to forecast future prepayment activity — a critical task in valuing mortgage bonds — doing so accurately is becoming more difficult as the market dislocation has continued unabated; sources tell HW that existing prepayment models are having trouble with current market conditions. “It’s definitely become more art than science in recent weeks,” one ABS analyst suggested to HW Wednesday morning, “which is sort of strange. Prepayment modeling isn’t usually something that requires so much leeway in interpretation. “It’s usually much more boring than that. But not in this market. Those that can get it right have a definite advantage.” For more information, visit http://www.mortgagebankers.com and http://www.mortgagemaxx.us.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
From resilience to antifragility: Rethinking cybersecurity for real estate and mortgage professionals
In information security, we’ve long spoken about resilience. The goal has been to withstand an attack, recover quickly, and return to business as usual. But in today’s environment—where attackers adapt and evolve daily—resilience is no longer enough. We must go further. We must embrace antifragility.
-
From local to global: RE/MAX’s Chris Lim on the next era of real estate relationships
-
Stop marketing like it’s 2008: You’re invisible
-
RE/MAX accelerates real estate innovation with AI and technology
-
Retirement plans for small-business owners have visible generational gaps
-
VA loans rise as housing market shifts toward buyers
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
