I’ve been involved in federal housing policy for more than 50 years, beginning my career at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the 1970s and later serving on the staff of the U.S. House Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs — now the Financial Services Committee — from 1983 to 2000. Over that time, I’ve watched the federal government’s role in housing shift dramatically — from builder to partner to convener.

Housing policy transformation

When I started, the federal government was a builder. HUD, newly created in 1965, oversaw large-scale housing programs like public housing, Section 236, and the original Section 8 construction subsidies. The mission, rooted in the Housing Act of 1949, was straightforward: provide decent, safe and sanitary housing for all Americans.

In the 1980s, under the Reagan Administration, federal housing policy pivoted. The focus moved away from building and managing housing directly to incentivizing private capital and state leadership. Programs such as the Housing Choice Voucher and the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) transformed the system, making private partners essential players. The federal government became less a developer and more a catalyst.

Today’s broader lens

In the 2020s, the conversation has widened again. Housing policy now intersects with transportation, climate resilience, health and racial equity. “Housing is infrastructure” isn’t just a slogan, it’s a recognition that affordable housing underpins every other social and economic goal.

Today’s landscape depends on cross-sector collaboration — federal, state, local and private partners each carrying part of the load. This diversification has increased flexibility but also complexity. Families seeking help now face a maze of programs, eligibility rules, and paperwork.

Technology as the next policy tool

The next big policy advance may not come from Congress but from technology. Platforms such as rental solutions that show what’s possible when we digitize housing access. By automating rental applications, verifying eligibility in real time, and connecting property owners with voucher holders, technology can dramatically reduce administrative friction.

This kind of innovation can make federal resources faster, fairer, and more efficient, ensuring that housing vouchers and rental assistance reach the people who need them—without the delays that too often define the process.

A reset worth pursuing

Each era in housing policy brought something valuable: the moral vision of the 1960s, the market discipline of the 1980s, and the cross-sector collaboration of today.
The next reset should merge these strengths — and add digital delivery as a force multiplier.

The tools have changed.
The mission hasn’t.


Joseph Ventrone has worked in federal housing policy for more than five decades. He currently serves as a Commissioner on the Arlington County Housing Commission in Virginia,  President of the North Rosslyn Civic Association and a voluntary senior advisor to Matrix Rental Solutions, a National Association of Realtors REACH company.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of HousingWire’s editorial department and its owners. To contact the editor responsible for this piece: tracey@hwmedia.com.

More: